Comparabilidad del autorrefractómetro portátil Retinomax K-plus 3 en modo rápido versus autorrefractómetro de sobremesa en modo estándar / Comparability of the Retinomax K-plus 3 handheld autorefractometer in quick mode versus on-table autorefractometer in standard mode

I ntroducción Este estudio analiza la comparabilidad de las medidas tomadas por un autorefractómetro portátil Retinomax K-plus 3 en modo Quick (rápido) y un autorrefractómetro de sobremesa Topcon KR-800 en modo estándar sobre la población pediátrica, y establece su correlación. Método Es un estudio comparativo retrospectivo. Se midieron las variables potencia dióptrica esférica (SPH), potencia dióptrica cilíndrica (CYL), ángulo del eje cilíndrico (AX) y equivalente esférico (SE) con el Retinomax en modo Quick y con el Topcon en modo estándar. Cada paciente fue evaluado en condiciones ciclopléjicas y no ciclopléjicas por ambos autorefractómetros. Se realizó la prueba t de Student entre ambos instrumentos para SPH, CYL y SE. Se calculó el coeficiente de correlación de Pearson y se representó la dispersión mediante gráficas de Bland-Altman, evaluándose también el subgrupo de pacientes menores de 4 años. Se realizó un análisis descriptivo de los porcentajes de medidas que diferían. Resultados Incluyó 98 ojos de 49 sujetos (rango de edad: 3-16 años). Los datos de SPH sin cicloplejia son prácticamente idénticos, mientras que con cicloplejia hay un sesgo hipermetrópico de +0,5 dioptrías medidas con Retinomax. Los resultados de CYL son muy similares con y sin cicloplejia. Existe una gran correlación de Pearson para ambos instrumentos (>0,91) y un bajo grado de dispersión en los gráficos de Bland-Altman bajo cicloplejia. Conclusión Los datos del Retinomax fueron consistentes con los obtenidos por el Topcon. El Retinomax es un instrumento útil para detectar errores de refracción en niños de entre 3 y 16 años (AU)

Introduction This study analyzes the comparability of measurements taken by a Retinomax K-plus 3 handheld autorefractometer in quick mode and a Topcon KR-800 on-table autorefractometer in standard mode on the pediatric population, and establishes their correlation. Methods It is a retrospective comparative study. Spherical diopter power (SPH), cylindrical diopter power (CYL), angle of cylindrical axis (AX), and spherical equivalent (SE) were measured with the Retinomax in quick mode and with the Topcon in standard mode. Each patient was evaluated in cycloplegic and non-cycloplegic conditions by both autorefractometers. Student's t-test was performed between the two instruments for SPH, CYL, and SE. The Pearson correlation coefficient was calculated and the dispersion was represented using Bland-Altman graphs, also evaluating the subgroup of patients under 4 years of age. A descriptive analysis of the percentages of measures that differed was performed. Results It included 98 eyes of 49 subjects (age range: 3-16 years). The data for HPS without cycloplegia are virtually identical, whereas with cycloplegia there is a hyperopic bias of +0.5 diopters measured with Retinomax. CYL results are very similar with and without cycloplegia. There is a high Pearson correlation for both instruments (>0.91) and a low degree of dispersion in the Bland-Altman plots under cycloplegia. Conclusion The Retinomax data were consistent with those obtained by Topcon. The Retinomax is a useful instrument for detecting refractive errors in children between 3 and 16 years of age (AU)

Comparability of the Retinomax K-plus 3 handheld autorefractometer in quick mode versus on-table autorefractometer in standard mode.

INTRODUCTION: This study analyzes the comparability of measurements taken by a Retinomax K-plus 3 handheld autorefractometer in Quick mode and a Topcon KR-800 on-table autorefractometer in standard mode on the pediatric population, and establishes their correlation. METHODS: It is a retrospective comparative study. Spherical diopter power (SPH), cylindrical diopter power (CYL), angle of cylindrical axis (AX), and spherical equivalent (SE) were measured with the Retinomax in Quick mode and with the Topcon in standard mode. Each patient was evaluated in cycloplegic and non-cycloplegic conditions by both autorefractometers. Student's t-test was performed between the two instruments for SPH, CYL, and SE. The Pearson correlation coefficient was calculated and the dispersion was represented using Bland-Altman graphs, also evaluating the subgroup of patients under 4 years of age. A descriptive analysis of the percentages of measures that differed was performed. RESULTS: It included 98 eyes of 49 subjects (age range: 3-16 years). The data for HPS without cycloplegia are virtually identical, whereas with cycloplegia there is a hyperopic bias of +0.5 diopters measured with Retinomax. CYL results are very similar with and without cycloplegia. There is a high Pearson correlation for both instruments (>0.91) and a low degree of dispersion in the Bland-Altman plots under cycloplegia. CONCLUSION: The Retinomax data were consistent with those obtained by Topcon. The Retinomax is a useful instrument for detecting refractive errors in children between 3 and 16 years of age.